Blog for the original Marty

Chuck Beatty posted this Ken Shapiro posting himself on ARS and on Mosey’s blog. He and Mike Rinder are lying that I posted it

with 4 comments

Marty, look at this.

I hardly remember my few discussions with Chuck Beatty on ARS but what I know for sure is that I didn’t have anything to do with this program of which I believe that it was Mike Rinder’s. So, I googled ARS and look what I found. It was Chuck Beatty himself who posted this Shapiro posting! He brought it up. He originated that “program” on ARS, and Mike Rinder and Chuck Beatty lied yesterday on Mosey’s husband’s blog that I did it. They are the worst liars under the ozone hole!

I didn’t post at all in that thread! What a bunch of hypocrites the so-called “Independents” are. They blame others on what they did and  do. It is so outrageous! It is unbelievable. There have no ethics at all. They have morals like alley cats.

Have you read all these postings on these so-called Independents and trolls and how they defend Chuck Beatty of being a victim despite Chuck Beatty lied thousands of times about the character of L. Ron Hubbard? For crying out loud: he posted that posting HIMSELF!

I don’t want to be involved with these people. I don’t want to know them because all they are trash. The truth shows what kind of people those are not Rinder’s secret service programs. Low guys dealing with other low guys, and they are trying to pull me into their low games. Thanks very much. I also don’t know KenShapiro or Tom Smith, never corresponded with them nor was/am I interested cooperating with them. Chuck Beatty thinks he is the cat’s meow and worth my time. Ridiculous.   

I love you, Marty.





Here is the evidence:

Chuck posted this himself and I didn’t post it. On Mosey’s husband’s blog, Mike Rinder and Chuck Beatty lied yesterday or today that I posted this:

Path:!!!not-for-mailFrom: “chuckbeatty77” <chuckbeatt…>Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientologySubject: Newly sent Ken Shapiro email regarding Chuck Beatty.Date: 28 Feb 2006 07:58:31 -0800Organization: 53Message-ID: <>NNTP-Posting-Host: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”iso-8859-1″X-Trace: 1141142317 24675 (28 Feb 2006 15:58:37 GMT)X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.comNNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:58:37 +0000 (UTC)User-Agent: G2/0.2X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/1.3.32 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [mtc-te013 8.3.5], HTTP/1.0[400C74CC] (Traffic-Server/5.4.2 [uScM])Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.comInjection-Info:; posting-host=;   posting-account=9Sqh7w0AAAAXrDvpYRrLV9ryVyIAS4ZF

From: Ken Shapiro khshapiro @hotmail.comTo: Tom Smith

February 27, 2006Dear Tom,
I have emailed some of you in the past with the intent to clarify Chuck Beatty?s motives in going after my friends ? and his former friends ?and for not being truthful.
Some of you falsely complained to and got my account cancelled.  I thought XSO was a place where people would discuss andshare their experience and that you are pro-free-communication asopposed to censorship.
I also thought that XSO is a place for old friends to share stories and not a group to preach a crusade, at least this is what Mick claims on XSO.
Well, I see you are conducting an anti-Scientology crusade and giving people like Chuck a forum to trash his former friends and group. It isa one way street with no balanced views.
Chuck decided to make my email public and thanks to his actions someoneis making postings in a newsgroup forging my name. These are the typical actions that are being caused by Chuck, but he of course is oblivious to it and claims that he is not harming anyone but just doing a public service. As a result, Chuck leaves me no choice other than going public myself to correct the lies and misleading information he is putting out there. The information will be published in my website.
Chuck alleges that ? someone is making me to do this.? He is wrong. He continues to ignore the very point of my original email as to his real motives for leaving. If he decided to leave the Church because hewanted to be able to engage in sexual perversion it?s his choice, butwhy does he then drag other people into his smear campaign against hisformer friends? Idon?t care if he likes to wear women?s underwear or look at childpornography. I don?t agree, but it?s his choice. What?s dishonest about it is that Chuck makes it look like he is a ?victim? when he is not. It makes it look like his entire life has been dictated by someone else, when he knows it is untrue.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and it is your decision tobelieve whatever you wish but I certainly hope you do so afterverifying the facts without bias or prejudice or preconceived ideas.


4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

    • They might not be coherently organized but people have ear implants and Germany has the overall control over it. If Germany wants Anonymous to jump on something, all they have to do is to radio in their ear implants and make them believe it was their idea. THAT is the deepest and darkest secret.

      Barbara Schwarz

      April 3, 2014 at 3:11 am

  1. Can you believe it, Leah Remini left Scientology to drink. Best thing about leaving Scientology is drinking alcohol she said.


    July 10, 2014 at 1:01 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s