ILoveMyOriginalMartyBlog

Blog for the original Marty

What is the exact definition of “ecclesiastical leader” of a religion? Is there such a thing as an ecclesiastical leader of a religion instead of a church?

with 7 comments

Dearest Marty, my sweet Prince,

I read a letter by Karin Pouw (I know her as Karin Godin and she also knows that Mosey’s husband isn’t you, because she was around when you and not Mosey’s husband was part of the RTC) to an Australian Broadcasting Corporation, dated November 9, 2011. I don’t want to go in any of the subjects, just want to remind that I mistrust the information of former infiltrator or infiltrator’s children within the Scientology orgs as much as those of current infiltrator or infiltrator’s children. There is just one line that I want to discuss. Karin describes David Miscavige as “ecclesiastical leader of the religion” (not the church but the religion Scientology). 

Can somebody be an ecclesiastical leader of a religion? I googled “ecclastical leader of religion” and got not one hit. 

I googled “ecclesiastical leader of the religion” and I got only links related to David Miscavige. That means that no other religion has an ecclesiastical leader. Only churches have ecclesiastical leaders no religions as such.

Here is my take on this: if Scientology would have stayed the way Ron, the real founder, established it, we would need no ecclesiastical leader of the religion Scientology but just a temporary leadership that keeps it running the way the real Ron left it until he’s back. This of course includes not injecting impostor material found in same  garage into Scientology, which apparently the  “ecclesiastical leader of the religion” is doing or intents to do.  

Here are some definition of “ecclesiastical”:

Relating to a church, especially as an organized institution (Okay, then such a leader should be and behave truly religious but shouldn’t introduce new material to Scientology, right,  of which he finds that Ron hasn’t introduced it  or hasn’t introduced it in orderly form.) [Give me a break!]

(Christianity/Ecclesiastical Terms) of or relating to the Christian Church, … associated with a church (especially a Christian Church)

(Yeah, Catholic looking pomp was introduced into SCN under DM, including the DM mobile that looks like a movie star bike 😉 The name Ron on the pomp stage has not much significance because he glorifies the impostor who left him Scientology and doesn’t investigate the true fate of the real founder.)

Term ecclesiastical is used in relation of the church, the organization of the church, or the clergy (Okay then, but that doesn’t mean that he has the authority to alter the religion by adding new stuff and cancelling for example book about past lives. Wonder if DM run one past live himself!? People who cancel past live information are suspicious to me.)

Of or pertaining to the church; relating to the organization or government of the church; not secular (DM behaves very secular, as far as I can see).

So, the ecclesiastical leader is no spiritual leader or founder and should just run organizations truly religiously,  but should not add and remove spiritual content by the founder, am I right? I am sure that DM says he doesn’t do that but is that really true?

Wish we could be together, Marty. I love you. 

Yours forever,

Sarah/Barbara

P.S. Still nobody has officially acknowledged that Ron was and you are impostored by doppelgangers! People are so untrue. It is a shame that they are allowed to call themselves human beings. 

Advertisements

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Can you imagine LRH on that stage? I can’t.

    Recorder

    November 30, 2011 at 10:15 am

    • The message is important not glimmer and pomp. I am not saying that a Scientology stage should look ugly or poor, but how about a natural stage and not Catholic or Hollywood? How much money goes into that pomp instead into dissemination? All that comes into my mind is that David Miscavige wants to be a king or a pope.

      People shouldn’t come to Scientology because of glitter but of the messages and the religion.

      If DM thinks that people come into Scientology because there is a lot of pomp, he surely attracts the wrong kind of people. I assume that those are the artificial people who leave then and attack Scientology.

      Barbara Schwarz

      November 30, 2011 at 11:20 am

  2. Do you ever ask yourself if you could be wrong about the COB, Barbara?

    Newbie

    November 30, 2011 at 11:55 am

    • Actually, Newbie, as a matter of fact, I asked myself that a couple of times. Instead of posting a long list, I want to remind you only to two important matters, that tell me that HIS COBNESS is not a good man.

      1) He does not investigate what happened to Ron, the real founder of Scientology, after he accepted Scientology from the impostor. Anyone can see that Ron was impostored by just comparing the photos. For somebody who claims to know Ron better than anyone, DM is a blind as a mole.

      2) He does not publish that Mosey’s husband is an impostor and does not reveal the whereabouts of the original Marty Rathbun who might indeed suffer innocent behind bars.

      I could go on but these two points are sufficient grounds for me to declare HIS COBNESS for as rotten like hell.

      Barbara Schwarz

      November 30, 2011 at 12:20 pm

  3. Would you watch the Young and the Restless if the blog-marty would play a guest role on Michael Fairman’s side?

    Paula .

    December 8, 2011 at 12:47 pm

    • Are you kidding me? I never had time to watch the Young and the Restless. But I saw a clip on YouTube. No actor I’ve seen on that clip was young or restless.

      Barbara Schwarz

      December 8, 2011 at 1:42 pm

  4. David Miscavige is in love with his position of the leader of Scientology but not Scientology as per LRH. DM sucks.

    Friend

    January 17, 2012 at 10:27 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s