Blog for the original Marty

This is the first time that I read the Daniel Montalvo declaration of Dec. 3, 2011 – and I am shocked by the lawlessness of former infiltrators of Scientology. (Monique was also involved.)

with 3 comments


Dearest Marty, my hero,

This is the first time that I read the Daniel Montalvo declaration of Dec. 3, 2011 – and I am shocked by lawlessness of anti-Scientologists. Again, I am not on DM’s side. Mosey’s husband and Mike Rinder, both above the law were David Miscavige’s right and left hand for decades! I really can’t excuse DM – besides, he knows that you are not Mosey’s husband and he did a damn to let the world know. 

However, two wrongs make no right. I despise both sides, but I never would steal property from either side or put somebody up to steal it.  How Monique’s husband, his wife and their supporters have the guts to claim that the orgs are criminal but not themselves too is beyond me.

The Daniel Montalvo declaration of Dec 3, 2011 (thanks for the Underground bunker litter box for posting it) indicates that Monique’s husband (and Monique being present), Tom DeVocht, Mike Rinder, and Tiziano Lugli knew that he stole Bridge IT property (five hard drives and four flash drives). Apparently, he was still working at Bridge when they had their claws into that young man and used him for their purposes. The Headleys apparently also were involved in this act.

He even used a Bridge car (auto theft?) to meet those extremists.

Monique’s husband even asked him if he got the flash drives, and Monique was apparently present. And she has the guts to say that she never ever did anything to the orgs.

Good grief.

How can she expect judge Dip Waldrip to grant her millions if she is involved in criminal activities like property theft against the orgs? In order to protect themselves from Monique, her husband and their friends and helpers, are the orgs not entitled to watch what they are during and hire PI’s to watch them? 

The donations that Monique and her husband are getting are apparently used for these criminal purposes. Do the donators know that their donations are used for criminal purposes? 

Montalvo also wrote under oath that he had no idea that Monique’s husband would spread his photo on the Internet.

Looks like Jason Beghe was also involved and that he offered to hide the hard drive in one of several metal shipping containers on his property. A Sheriff searched for these drives, isn’t that obstruction of justice? And didn’t Beghe go after this boy with a weed whacker? Gee! What kind of people are those? How could they ever end up in Scientolopy?

I know a place for all of them: PRISON instead of being awarded with millions.

If you don’t establish that Mosey’s husband isn’t you and that you have nothing to do with his lawlessness, you could be blamed of what he did and does. I know that you know this. 

I love you, Marty. Many kisses. I’ll be on the road today.

Yours forever,




3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Wow, involved in theft of property and Monique was there. Betcha, by golly, Monique can kiss her multimillion damage suit goodbye.


    October 22, 2013 at 7:58 am

    • The problem for Monique to get multi-million Dollars from the orgs is that the orgs apparently can prove that Monique wasn’t a person that didn’t share her husband’s activities to ruin the orgs.

      She was quite heavily involved in her hubby’s activities, and I think that just a biased judge would not want to see this.

      Also, in order to protect their property from more such cases as the Montalvo case, I think that the orgs have the right to put people under surveillance (by hiring ex-law enforcement officers) to watch those who were involved in that Montalvo case.

      I still think that the Squirrel Busters were a dumb idea and played into the hands of Monique and her husband, but overall, I think that the orgs have an excellent case to get this gold-digger case dismissed.

      However, if the Squirrel Buster operation is ruled against the law, the activities of Tory Christman, Garry Scarff, “Anon Sparrow” etc. (filming Scientologists, wearing uniform TS-shirts with SP on it (which is dumb as who wants to talk to SPs?) to introvert, trying to provoke Scientologists by being verbally abusive) must be banned too. Also the activities of Mosey’s husband and Mike Rinder before the Fort Harrison Building was then against the law.

      The thing is that they think that when they are doing it, it is alright. When others that are connected to SCN are doing it, they have to pay multi-million damages.


      Fighting this case back is much better than paying these people. Besides, if Monique is being paid, the rest of the anti-Scientologists will file gold digger cases as well.

      This said, I am still not endorsing DM at all.

      Barbara Schwarz

      October 23, 2013 at 5:42 am

  2. Thanks Barbara for speaking the truth!!! I do not always agree 100% with all of your views, but then again you may have more insight on some issues than I do – but – you do NAIL down the truth on many many issues and, for what its worth, I appreciate you taking the time to do that.



    October 23, 2013 at 12:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.