Donald Trump, a fool, the ultimate disgrace, and the Evangelicals still are supporting him!

Dearest Marty, my hero and ethical Prince, how is your life? I worry about you as I know how gruesome SPs can be. 

Who will vote for Trump, proud to be German? He speaks about people of other races and women the way he does, shouldn’t be surprised when others are appalled of him. That man is stupid and he doesn’t know it. WHAT was the GOP thinking nominating him? They should use the tonescale. But instead they are bringing the GOP down. They are losing the White House and might even lose Congress if they don’t change course. Infiltration and ear-implants bring down anything. Religion, morals, values, governments, and a party that freed slaves.   

Some of the people who still will vote for him were interviewed and asked why they are still for Trump. They think that Trump’s character has nothing with how Trump will behave as President. They think that a low character can be a good president. Hell’s bells!  Their lack of knowledge human nature is shocking. Everything about a person is hinged and connected.

I read that the “Evangelicals”, a Protestant movement, keeps on supporting Trump despite anything he did and does. The National Association of Evangelicals says that they consists of Reformed, Holiness, Anabaptist, Pentecostal, Charismatic, and other directions. If they support Trump, his lack of morals and lewdness, imo, they sink to the level of the perverts in the Catholic Church. 

Marty, I really noticed this again and again: so many Christians have not much of a conscience. They are indoctrinating themselves and others that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit forgives any sins anyway, it doesn’t matter how horrible they are. So, why being ethical if these three welcome anyway each pig and monster into paradise? All they have to say and maybe mean for a little moment: I am sorry. This of course first when they  are standing before Heaven’s gate BUT UNTIL THEN, LET’S FORGET ETHICS AND LET’S SIN! 

They must think that the Holy Trinity is stupid.

Also, did you ever understand the weird concept that Jesus’s death on the cross FORGAVE THEIR SINS (!)? 

RB forced me as minor to attend Lutheran Church. I heard “Jesus died for our sins” all the time and always thought what a piece of crap that is. Jesus came to help mankind, but that the Messiah was brutally killed makes it a lot WORSE for mankind not better. It just shows what bad people are capable of.   

There are various Christian interpretations on the “atonement”:

Christus Victor: Jesus’s death defeated the powers of evil, which had held humankind in their dominion. I still can’t see how a brutal death can archive that, Marty. And evil in the world isn’t defeated. It is 2016. The world is bad and dangerous. Evangelicals want a man who sees other races and women as inferior and admitted to group sex and wanting to break marriage vows of others to lead the USA. And that is for sure not the only evil thing that they support. Christus Victor says that Jesus’s work is a victory over the powers that hold mankind in bondage: sin, death, and the devil. Yes, what Jesus did but not what mankind incl. the Christian churches did and do. It is 2016 and what do we see when looking around just a bit? Sin, death, and SPs, and a possible “future leader of the free world” who has no morals. I am sure that Trump will lose but so many Evangelicals want this man to win. 

Satisfaction theory of atonement: This one is very creepy. Jesus Christ suffered crucifixion as a substitute for human sin. Christ’s death, the ultimate act of obedience, brings God great honor. The trinity says that Holy Trinity is one being, right? Consisting of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. So, according to this atonement, God wants his other identity being obedient to himself as this brings himself great honor? Huh?  It makes no sense in hell, except that those believers are creeps and want the easy way out: not having to change their rotten ways unless last-minute when they stand in front of the pearly gates (by saying: “Gee, God, I’m sorry… Let me in…”) They want to commit crimes but have no plans to change and don’t want to make amends for their damage.  Besides, who says that for all damage commit by sins amends can be made and forgiveness obtained? Some crimes are so brutal and gruesome that I wonder who they, who are committing them, can even remotely think that they will ever have a good feeling about themselves. They are wasting away what is most valuable: deep happiness and serenity. In other words, they are idiots.   

Penal substitution: Another very creepy justification.  It says that Jesus, by own sacrificial choice, was punished instead of the sinners as substitution and thus satisfying the demands of justice so God can justly forgive the sins. Christians don’t know God, otherwise they wouldn’t make up that kind if rubbish. Jesus didn’t want to be butchered. Came to help people by showing them a much better way to live. SPs made the choice to brutally murder Jesus (and Jesus’s dearest) and God (who, even according to the Christians, IS Jesus) does not forgive sins of sinners by having his own identity being brutally murdered or murdered at all.  

Ransom theory of atonement: Yikes! It teaches that the death of Christ was a ransom sacrifice paid to Satan or to death itself or even to God the Father, in satisfaction for the bondage and debt on the souls of humanity as a result of inherited sin. Once again, Christians are saying that The Holy Spirit, the Father, and the Son are one being, yet, on the other side, they are saying that God the Father, or the Holy spirit wants satisfaction by having his own kid, his own identity (himself!) murdered or forgave the sin of mankind after that brutal act. Holy smoke! I doubt that Christians think much about their teachings as they make no sense whatsoever. They do not want to pay for their own sins and do not want to give them up either until the very last-minute after death before the gates of paradise so that they can get in. They are using Jesus as justification. And they think that God wants such hypocrites of Christians or any other religions or also atheists in paradise.  

They also say that one does inherit the sins of others. Just like that. I was thinking how one could inherit sins, Marty. I never made sense to me that I should inherit for example RB’s sin or other people’s sins by opposing them and their activities all my life. But there is actually a way to inherit overts (sins, in Christian words). For example, people all over the world join and support the ear-implant conspiracy. One must be very dumb not getting that the people behind this systems are evil, are Nazis, and lawless psychiatrists. Now, by working for this conspiracy instead of working against it, one inherits their crimes due to agreement.  Who supports Nazis is a Nazi. This is the only way one can inherit sins, by agreement, by working for SPs or supporting them by basically knowing how bad they are. 

Here is my conclusion: Christians (Catholic and Evangelicals) look for a justification to be unethical and they want an easy way out: “Thanks for suffering for our sins, Jesus. We repent outside the gates of paradise to get in, but until then, we support Satan.”  

None of those four Christian atonements work or make sense. Scientology in comparison makes a lot of sense.

Overt:
A. An overt act is injuring someone or something; it is also an act of omission or commission that does harm to any or all dynamics.
B . Any intentionally committed harmful act committed in an effort to resolve a problem.
C.  The things that people do of which they don’t want that it happens to them.

Motivator:
A. An aggressive or destructive act received by the person. It’s called a motivator because it tends to prompt that one pays it back—it “motivates” a new overt.
B . Something which the person feels has been done to him, which he is not willing to have happen.
C. An act received by the person or individual causing injury, reduction or degradation of his beingness, person, associations or dynamics.  A motivator is a harmful action performed by somebody else against oneself.

Overt-motivator sequence:
A. If a person commits an overt, he/she will then believe he/she has a motivator to do so: like that other person deserved it, etc.
B. The sequence wherein someone who has committed an overt has to claim the existence of motivators. The motivators are then most of the time used to justify committing further overt acts.

And by committing OWs, the person gets smaller, blinder, dumber, and it shows on the inside and also on the outside through yucky charisma.   

No delusion that God forgives OWs and whitewashes pigs. Holding people responsible to live an ethical life. Original Scientology raises the ethics level. Unless one is a stupid infiltrator and never honestly studied Scientology properly.  

I don’t see that other religions are raising the ethic level of people. I also don’t see the atheist movement raising the ethic level or people.  One is responsible for not committing OWs (or sins as the Christians say). Nothing will change that. The way out is not a lazy and comfy one. One has to work on ones own character. 

Proud to be an original Scientologist! Proud to have you as my soulmate, Marty. You should run for US President. I love you intellect and morals. I always did. I could see and feel them when I was around you. It makes you more exciting than anyone else. The really ethical one wins first. Bad people win nothing but their bad conscience, and I can see it usually on the outside what a person is up to on the inside and what she had done. I know you can too.  

Be passionately and tenderly kissed. 

Yours forever,

Sarah/Barbara