Why I don’t trust Mark Bunker (Emmy Award Winning Journalist) at all!

Dearest Marty, my one and only Prince,

Maybe you heard the news or you will hear this soon: Mark Bunker supports your impostor Mosey’s husband.

And here are some of my big problems with Mark Bunker, who is an Emmy-winning reporter who doesn’t get that L. Ron Hubbard was impostored.

The question is: how blind is Mark Bunker not to see that L. Ron Hubbard was impostored by “Jack Vistaril” and you are impostored by Mosey’s husband? Years ago, Mark Bunker used to post on ARS, where he has seen my postings. He knows since many years that I am saying that Ron and you were impostored, but in all those years, the Emmy-winning reporter (who says that he is banned on YouTube at the moment but didn’t tell why) failed to compare photos and footage of “Jack Vistaril” and Mosey’s husband with the real Ron, founder of Scientology and the original Inspector General for Ethics: you, the first Marty Rathbun in Scientology.

So, whatever Mark Bunker’s film will show, it will not be the truth because he swims in the same stream with the rest of the foolish people or those who cover the truth up.

  

Isn’t that the ultimate homework that one should expect from a reporter when writing about Scientology? But this also goes for other reporters who failed to do this, e.g. the SP Times reporters, Janet Reitman, Tony Ortega, etc., etc., any reporter who ever reported about Scientology should be able to see it by comparing the footage and the photos to each other. It is so easy but they all are keeping the dirty “little” secret until they will break nevertheless, and nobody will refer to any of them as “experts” on Scientology.

I know, Mark Bunker often comes across like a decent guy who just happen to dislike certain aspect of DM’s reign. After upset Tommy Davis confirmed to the SP Times that there were indeed approx. 50 beatings at the Int Base, I heard Mark Bunker on his Xenu TV saying that if that would happen in a corporation, the CEO would be out of a job. I was thinking that Mark Bunker was right on that, that no leader should stay in power after such activities happen in his top management, but yet, Mark Bunker supports your impostor, Marty, who admitted of having been violent to others in the very top management and who shows another example of his bad temper by slamming several times the car door in the head of a reporter. (He could have died on the head injuries and Mosey’s husband on the defendant bench.)  Mark Bunker’s high morals are suddenly gone.  In other words: he is just against certain “slappers” and not  all “slappers”.

But here is the message in a nutshell: anyone who does not see or does not say that the biggest problem of Scientology is non-Scientology infiltration and psychiatric organized doppelgangers and impostors will go as stupid little footnote into history.

Guess Mark Bunker handles my criticism by saying that I would be an OSA agent or crazy or whatever. I am none of it, but if I would be one of that or all three together, the fact that Ron was and you are impostor remains. One just has to print out all the photos and start comparing…

Scientology is my religion. It is natural that I support it but not when it is taken over by some secret service agents who tried to use me in their programs. Once again, I do not even remotely approve of Tory Christman and Chuck Beatty. I don’t want to be associated with them.  They kiss up to Mosey’s husband on his blog and in other forums, they are the worst defamers of the founder and our religion. 

According to the secret service OSA programs that Mike Rinder had in his possession from the times when he overlooked or managed OSA, there was allegedly an initiative “to stir me up”.  But as the Internet proves, it didn’t work. I didn’t know, work on, or execute secret service programs. I read them know, I think that they might contain correct data on Christman, Beatty, and others, but these programs are no Scientology programs. Whoever had the idea to “stir me up” is clueless about my personality. I was kicked out because I didn’t follow infiltrator orders. What I don’t find ethical, I don’t do.

Tory posted that she worked on some programs on ARS that were above the law. I did not and never worked on such. That is one of  the differences between Mark Bunker’s friend Tory Christman and I. While Mike Rinder was still at INT, he hoped that I would get his stats up: but again: what’s not ethical, I won’t do. Moreover, who covers up where you, the first Marty Rathbun in Scientology is, is also not my friend and not supported by me.

I have a lot of energy, and I could do a lot for my religion. All that energy is unused. I could move mountains. But instead helping my religion, I put my energy in earning money. And why? Because there is nothing to support. Supporting the orgs or the “Independents” is like supporting the same secret service that exchanged Ron with the impostor and Mosey’s husband with you. And why would I do that? 

If somebody wants my support, he or she has to be completely honest with me. If the person has no intention to do it or is too remote-controlled by his or her psych case officer, he or she won’t get anywhere with me. Whoever wrote or supervised these programs on Christman and Beatty has no idea of my personality or ethics level.

Yes, I want Christman and Beatty stop spreading lies about the founder and our religion, but I also want a better world. Parts of these programs are on the same level that is not creating a better world or a waste of time, and that’s where they can’t count on me. I handle SPs by confronting them with the truth. (When I was the AG MUN, my BI did not run one ops. Just overt data collection.) I don’t “handle” SPs by committing low actions against them and turning SP myself. No, I won’t do that.  How can that create a better world? Okay, one  or the other SP might get tired on these secret service programs and retire from attacking our religion but the next SPs or a whole bunch of them (either former infiltrators or others) will be stirred up again by the psychs, and the insane fight continues. All these “programs” are nothing worth, and yes, it is insulting to find my name in it.

Instead trying to include me and my name in ridiculous or even grey legal zone programs, Scientologists should ask me: Barbara, how would you handle this?

I know how, and I would show them that I can handle it,  and it would be no freaking secret service crap but ethical handling.

But as I said, in return, they have to be completely honest with me, and if they don’t want this, they can go to (their self-made) hell with those who they try to handle for all I care. 

 I love you, Marty. You know how I am. You never would try to include me in something as a ops. Just like me, you were always open and never wrote nor worked on one. “Jack Vistaril” was the secret service freak, not Ron, the founder. He was the religious and decent man.   

Many kisses my sweetheart until we meet again, hopefully soon!

Yours

Sarah/Barbara