There are no indications that Hal Putthoff and Ingo Swann were real Scientologists

Good morning, Marty, my wonderful prince, how are you?

I would be a lot better if I would know where you are and how to help you. It is so gruesome not being told what exactly happened to you and where you are. I depend completely on my OT abilities to figure out your whereabouts and those who try  to sell me that you are Mr. Texas are trying to invalidate these OT perceptions.

Passover ends tomorrow and I wonder if you and your family can celebrate any holidays with you not being with them. But any day will be a celebration once you are exonerated and we are back together.

Also, I wonder what happen to writing KRs. In my org if somebody noticed violence,  he or she had to write a KR immediately and a violent person was routed off and the authorities informed. Nobody was so desperate keeping somebody on staff who had violence tendencies. During my time on staff, anybody knew that a violent person is not a Scientologist as not applying Scientology.

DM might have remove some people off their positions but he kept them in orgs, the SP Hall, RPF, special projects, Sea Org berthing, etc.  and didn’t turn them over to the authorities. Ron would not have kept a violent person near Scientologists or others.

On the other side, Norman Starkey’s remark on national TV that a certain person cannot return ever to Scientology is off policy too. Ron said that the door is always open – and if just a crack – once a person truly changed its rotten behavior. Saying that a person may never allowed back may just result in that a person continues her way. Why should she change? Norman Starkey said she can’t ever come back… And he doesn’t seem counting with Ron coming back and implementing his “door is a crack open”-policy.

Something else, Marty, during the last days, I read more about that past Remote Viewing project and I got to say, people who are no Scientologists cannot make a government understand Scientology (in this case I mean the remote viewing and the CIA).

As more as I read about Ingo Swann or Swan and Hal Puthoff as more I understand that both never were Scientologists. They may have experienced a bit around with Scientology but never lived per our religion an never understood Ron’s wisdom and findings.

I checked Ingo Swann’s website and nothing indicates that he understood or applied Ron’s technology. Same goes for Hal Puthoff. As more as I read by him, as more I get that he is not a Scientologist. They were probably squirrels but no Scientologists.

And that brings me to this point: as no real Scientologists explained real Scientology to the CIA or other governmental offices, they didn’t understand it. This is how the remote viewing project was goofed and on top of it was supervised by “Let’s kill an elephant with LDS”-psych Jolly West who was biased towards Scientology.

It is sort of how Battlefield Earth, the movie was goofed. Nothing can be considered done right when it results in ridiculing Ron and Scientology. Nothing can be considered done right when Scientology never got a chance as represented by people who never truly applied or understood it.

If Ingo Swann or Hal Putthoff would have been real Scientologists, they would have explained to the CIA what Ron would have told them.

1)      Remote viewing abilities can be sabotaged by p$ychs who interfere with modern technology and interrupt those abilities. In other words, they can cloak the target that should be viewed or they can radio with silent sounds in the subconscious mind of a person and thereby render the remote viewing ability incapacitated.

2)      Remote viewing abilities can be staged, e.g. a  remote viewer’s case officer can radio him data through his ear implants with the purpose to mislead the agency.

But Ron had the solution for such cases too. As in original Dianetics and other original processing, Ron knew how to see and discover despite the secret psych sabotage. Ron didn’t just discover a working technology to help people figure out the physical and spiritual universe, he did it under  hard and almost impossible circumstances: while the  SEGNPMSS tried all they could to actively stop him.

It all boils down to that no real Scientologists could explain real Scientology to the feds as the SEGNPMSS sabotaged everything. That means despite so much was written about Dianetics and Scientology, people and very so the feds are completely clueless as to what it really is.

And check this PDF out. These guys don’t know what the “essence of consciousness” is. Exactly as Ron said so many years ago. Nobody could tell him what a person exactly is, nobody was able to explain the spirit that inhabits a body or the “essence of consciousness”.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/learnremoteviewing/ScientificProofAndEvidence.pdf

But the “essence of the consciousness” and its place in the universe is no mystery to a Scientologist. It’s the thetan. Did you hear Ron  in that taped interview indicating that  people are somehow afraid of spiritual beings but then they find out that they themselves are these spirits? He is quite amused about that.

I will be back, Marty, I miss you more than words can say. I would do anything and go anywhere to be reunited with you.  I am not just infatuated with you, I adore you with each part of my being. I refuse to give up on you  and I’ll stand by you until the end of time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vofljtc9ko&feature=related

Yours,

Sarah/Barbara