Monique’s husband (allegedly no part of organized crime) had extensive liaison with experts in the subject, from local law enforcement, to the Texas Attorney General’s Office, to the United States Department of Justice??? If he doesn’t impostor you as part of organized crime, Marty, is he impostering you completely on his own volition?

Dearest Marty, my one and only, how are you?

I’m waiting for the plumber to come by. There is water leaking outside near the house and I better have fixed that soon. Last time, he overcharged me and asked three times the price. (After I complained to his partner, he gave me 100 bucks back.) This time I better watch what he is doing and that he is doing it right, and I won’t let him get away with overcharging me again.

To the other subject: Monique’s husband. This man is unbelievable. He is your impostor. If it is really true (however, he admitted before on TV that he is a liar) that he had extensive liaison with local law enforcement,  to the Texas Attorney General’s Office, to the United States Department of Justice, these authorities then are working with your impostor together, Marty. You would have serious legal claims against them if Monique’s husband wasn’t lying.

If he is not part of organized crime (yeah right!) despite his actions to impostor you fit perfectly into German secret service plans to make you disappear and undo your legacy, then he is alone responsible for impostering you. According to that, not even David Miscavige or Mike Rinder put him up to be your impostor. (And he impostors you also before the court and in affidavits.)  Then he did it all on his own. This guy has some nerves, I am telling you.

I have seen the YouTube video, where Monique’s husband, directs Monique to interrupt the conversation of the Busters. She follows him like a puppet. I never have seen anything like that before. She would have never filed that Million Dollar case if he wouldn’t put her up for it. He doesn’t support her. It is *His* case. He wants the millions so badly.

By settling with Debbie Cook, Wayne Baumgarten, and detectives  Marrick and Arnold, DM sent a message that C of S is the cash cow for anyone. That invited more cases, and particularly that of Monique. If he settles with her, multiple other get-rich-lawsuits by others suing the orgs will follow.

Monique’s husband is a coward. He has no guts to sue the C of S as he is afraid that they will no longer cover for him.  Tommy Davis indicated something to the SP-Times that they know something real shocking about Monique’s husband. I wonder how long C of S will still cover for Mosey’s husband before they reveal this. 

How can the surveillance of Monique be so bad that it warrants millions of Dollars damages if he doesn’t sue too?  After all, he lived with her all the time at the same place. If he hasn’t grounds to sue, how come she has them? As he isn’t a co-plaintiff of her legal action (he thinks he’s getting the millions from obedient wifey once she got them), it makes her claims really really small.   

As for sexual harassment, if she gets millions for it, I should too. Some people say that I err and that Dave Touretzky never mailed me that sexually harassing mail that I got some years ago. Do you know why I differ with them? Because back then, he had pornographic images right on this CMU website. It was set up as if that mail was sent by the orgs but I am sure they didn’t mail it to me. ReligiousFreedomWatch contacted me later wanting a copy of that mail. Many in the orgs consider me difficult (including DM, I bet), so I am sure that they never would have contacted me if OSA originated that harassing mail.  It can be determined by a DNA-test who mailed it. If Touretzky’s DNA isn’t in it, he is not the sexual harasser. But I think Dave Touretzky doesn’t think that porn is low and harassing to a woman. For him it is probably just “a guy thing”.  

Anyway, it was reported that Monique said before the court that she doesn’t know who mailed her the sex toy to her or a romantic note to a co-worker. If she can’t prove it, if DNA doesn’t prove that DM or OSA or the busters mailed that, she can’t expect millions by the C of S.

I doubt that Dip Waldrip is a decent judge, Marty.  He said something odd, in my opinion. He said something like that he would fear “appeals” in regards to that the various Scientology identities had their own lawyers. Should a judge be afraid of appeals or should he just rule what the law says and what’s the right thing  for justice? If he fears appeals, he is already indicating that what he plans to rule has grounds for appeals.  I find this odd, even biased towards Scientology.

Maybe he is also star-struck ordering Leah Remini to testify.  As she didn’t even knew where Michelle Miscavige is, what makes the court think that she knows DM’s other activities?

The orgs should have published right from the start that Monique’s husband is your impostor, Marty. DM knows for sure. Mike Rinder too. Now they are getting their motivators. They are such non-Scientologists in actions. If they would be real Scientologists they would have know that the impostor actions will come back to bite them. Truth comes out always, said Ron, and yes, it does.   

Love you so very much,

Yours forever.

Sarah/Barbara

David Miscavige did not kill Lisa McPherson – p$ychs did…

Dearest Marty, my hero,

Can’t believe that Mike Rinder and Mosey’s husband makes me defend David Miscavige. David Miscavige did not kill Lisa McPherson, but he (and others) are making constantly the mistake not showing with the fingers on the p$ychs who set her up to die. It doesn’t actually matter if Lisa was a Clear or an OT or not. It doesn’t even matter if she got squirrel auditing or C/Sing.  

When p$ychs ambush a person and implant her, they undo the clear mind and the OT abilities. You know that p$ychs implant just about anything in the subconscious mind of persons to pervert and confuse them.

They make people unconscious, putting her with drugs into a narcosis and then, they hypnotize and implant all kinds of comments into her subconscious mind. Then they give her the command to forget what happened to her.    

Such an altered person when evil attacks others; somebody who is not evil will be very unhappy too and might self-destruct but at least doesn’t take others with her.

In the case of Lisa, I strongly suspect that she was also injected by psychs with deadly bacteria. I believe that it is true that she died officially on pulmonary embolism, a  blockage of the main artery of the lung by a substance that has travelled from elsewhere in the body through the bloodstream, e.g. a blood clot.  But I think she was injected in Orlando with germs that p$ychs remote-controlled into forming a blood clot. 

Remote controlled germs cannot just build stuff…

http://www.signallake.com/innovation/GermsBuildCircuits1103.pdf

They can also destruct stuff including and very much so  the human body.

When I heard about Lisa McPerson and how she was and became, it reminded me on what I saw in the German university loony bin. Average people, as you meet them any day checked in their with a small problem “feeling a bit down today”, and turned into scary altered people after having been with the psychs in private chambers.

Lisa’s roommate said that she was just fine and normal when she left for a conference in Orlando. She stayed there in a hotel for a weekend. My intuition (which is the OT kind of intuition) tells me that p$ychs entered her hotel room and set her up to die.

What David Miscavige but also Mosey’s husband, Mike Rinder, Alain Kartusinski, Debbie Cook, and anyone else who came in contact with this case failed to do is to investigate her days between being normal and returning home confused. It is not the car accident that she had. I believe that this accident happened after the psychiatric alteration of this very unlucky Scientologist.

Psychs try to force the orgs to officially recognize and accept psychiatry. After she undressed in the streets, psychs allowed Lisa to go with Scientologists for just one purpose: to let her die in their care and to make her to be the example that the orgs must turn over confused Scientologists to THEM, to the PSYCHS!

Any smart Scientologist should be able to figure out what’s behind the McPherson case. You and I, we can look through p$ychs. They are no match for us but those who worked on this case, didn’t get it, or they failed to speak out about of it.

They didn’t fight back. CCHR writes only about p$ych cases that are set up outside of the orgs. They try to make the world believe that anything under Ron’s impostor “Jack Vistaril” and David Miscavige is honey and milk and under control. 

It is not. They don’t have the constant willingness to fight the p$ychs back, and this is why the p$ychs feel undetected in the orgs and that is why they continue with their set ups against Scientologists.

This is one of the biggest mistakes that David Miscavige did. He sits there and let’s p$ychs step all over Scientologists. 

I might be “just a woman” but I would investigate and document even the smallest lead of psych activities within or around any org or against any Scientologist. They would think twice before setting up another secret p$ych attack. David Miscavige always waits for things to blow over to have time to play with this Hollywood friends. That is not the priority. The first priority is to convict the secret service p$ychs and to document their covert actions to the world and not working in their favor. 

It doesn’t matter if stupid people think that I am crazy by saying that a German psych secret service, one that does not respect borders of another country is setting such things up. I don’t care what stupid people think. I trust my own observations and experiences, and as a Scientologist  and former Scientology executive in Germany and on an international level, I have seen  these hidden p$ych actions in the orgs. They also happened against me.

If David Miscavige doesn’t make it to his job to investigate and document each psychiatric secret service activity against Scientology and Scientologists, and I never have read any C of S press release that he does, but rather waits until things blow over (and psychs working already for the next crime to commit against Scientologists or Scientology), guess he doesn’t deserve better than being accused of what his former right and left hand accuse him on.

The list of Scientologists who died under strange circumstances or even those set up to commit crimes must be reviewed and documented with alertness to spot psych alteration of these people. CCHR failed completely to do so! DM failed completely to order CCHR to do so. Mike Rinder and Mosey’s husband or any other exec failed to do so. 

You would never make his kind of errors, Marty, never!  Besides being such a tender and passionate man, Marty, I picked you also for your high IQ and for having real OT abilities.  

You wife,

Love forever

Sarah/Barbara

 

David Miscavige’s Confidentiality Agreement does not protect the founder L. Ron Hubbard! Ron a “nobody” in Miscavology?

Dearest Marty, my wonderful husband,

Funny cartoon but that DM doesn’t protect Ron’s reputation IS NOT FUNNY.

I read the motion that Flag filed (of course on behalf of DM) against Debbie Cook on March 2, 2012 (Cause No. 2012-CI-01272) in the 150th Judicial Circuit Court in Bexar County, Texas. I am not on Debbie Cook’s side, because she never should have accepted the money. I don’t believe that she was unable to leave the office of attorney  Elliot Abelson without signing the contract. And if she would have been forced to sign, she could have signed it but should have walked the same or the next day to the authorities and should have turned the contract and the money over to them. In other words: I do not believe her “I am a poor victim” story. I think she is quite calculating. 

Having said this, I discovered that the Confidentiality Agreement that David Miscavige had Debbie Cook sign, does not protect the name and reputation of L. Ron Hubbard. Elliot says that DM is the boss. Apparently, DM approves what the attorneys draft for people to sign or what is being filed. 

People like Chuck Beatty, Tory Christman, Gerry Armstrong would be not in violation of such an Agreement if they would disparage the founder (which they do since many years). Same would apply to Jeff Hawkins, Marc Headley, Larry Brennan, and others. If they would sign such an agreement, they would not be allowed to say a word against DM, his operations and any Miscavologist, but Ron is NOT protected by these agreements, and they could disparage the founder as much as they want. Or am I wrong?   

Actually, I don’t find it funny that Ron’s reputation is not protected and all is about DM who cited himself apparently in plural number. He is no longer THE ecclesiastical leader but he is now ecclesiastical leaders. (plural!)  

I read through the motion filed by Clemens and  Spencer and found no line whatsoever that says that DM’s (Flag’s) Confidentiality Agreements protect L. Ron Hubbard. It means that L. Ron Hubbard is a nobody in the mind of DM, his attorneys, and the Miscavologists.

This is from the motion: “Maintain confidentiality of information about their experiences with the Scientology religion”. (Weird. What is that all about? We wrote public success stories about our experiences with the SCN religion. But this was before DM.)

The motion: “They further agreed that they would refrain from disseminating either by word or by writing any disparaging statement about the Scientology religion or the organisation, staff, and membership of Scientology organizations.” (Again, no word about that the founder’s reputation should be protected too.)

The motion: “Debbie Cook disclosed confidential and non-public purported info about Scientology churches, ecclesiastical leaders, practices, financial information and disparaged the church and its leadership.” (Again, no word about Ron’s reputation that is damaged by alleged Scientologists attacking each other.)

The motion: Debbie Cook expressly promised to never disclose any info, data or knowledge [they] learned or will learn relating to any of the releases [i.e. inter alia, the plaintiff church and all other Scientology churches, or their officers, directors, trustees, staff members and agents] that has not been authorized for release to the general public. (Again, no word that people who want to leave are not allowed to disparage L.Ron Hubbard.) 

This motion: cites case-law, e.g. Snepp, a former CIA agent against the USA. (Really, DM runs C of S as if it would be a secret service, although he indicated in a narration that it is not the CIA who runs the orgs. No wonder than even my name ended up in a secret service program instead in religious operations, the only place where my name should be. And Ron’s and your’s too, Marty.)

BTW, I doubt that DM did think his idea of “awarding people who want to blow with lot of cash that they don’t talk about me” through. Such agreements could result in that infiltrators now want to blow and being paid 50.000 Dollars or more.

What a mess! 

I love you, Marty. And miss you so much.

Yours forever,

Sarah/Barbara

Outpoints in Debbie Cook’s story. (She felt that she was forced to sign the contract but she could have taken the contract and the cash and gone right to the authorities, the very next day. Why didn’t she do it?)

Dearest Marty, my irresistible soul mate,

What I find odd is that Debbie Cook did not write one word of the alleged abuse in her e-mail to Scientologists. If true what she claims, why did she not tell them? She just talks about abuse, after she was sued by DM for breach of contract.

There was abuse and she did not go to the authorities? Okay, she said that she was held against her will on DM’s orders. Don’t know if this is true but let’s say, it is. After she had left staff and drove to the car rental place, and after she was unified with her husband, she made a trip to NC. Why didn’t she make one to the authorities? The media reported that she said she witnessed following before her trip to NC:  kidnapping, forced false confessions, beatings, attacks, no sleep, no real food, somebody was forced to lick a bathroom floor clean after objecting to violence against others, slapping, threat of breaking a finger, water poring over her, being accused of being a lesbian, etc.,  She claims that much of that happened in DM’s “hole”.

We all know that is not Scientology but German Nazi stuff. DM really asks for it by not just assigning top jobs to infiltrators but also by having people thrown into the hole. Can’t he figure that bad treatment of anyone causes him enemies? Ron wrote so many policies as to how to handle persons, also unethical persons. Bad treatment and antagonizing people is not a part of any of his writings.

Anyway, with all that seen, Debbie just writes a letter to thousands of Scientologists but says no word about the alleged abuse to anyone? She writes no complaint to the authorities to protect allegedly abused Scientologists in the hole and elsewhere? She signs a contract and accepts USD 100.000 hush money instead from DM? What is wrong with that woman?

Let’s say, she signed a contract just to get away from DM, his security guards, and lawyers. Why didn’t she and her husband go to the authorities rights after it happened and turned the contract and the hush money over to them?

If that abuse took place as she said, why did she keep quiet for five years?

Some might think that “critics” or “Independents” swayed me to believe wrongfully that DM is not a good person. That is not true. My main problem with him always was that he accepted SCN from Ron’s impostor and that he doesn’t inform me about your whereabouts and accepted Mosey’s husband, your impostor on your post, Marty. But I didn’t believe the stories of violence for many years. Unless Tommy Davis’ statement to the SP Times, saying that “they” (DM and his supporters) wouldn’t had said anything about Mosey’s husband violent behavior if he wouldn’t had turned on them. That did it for me. How dare them all to degrade Scientology that way and cause a bad reputation, the reputation of violence. That is a reputation that Scientology didn’t have before DM run it.

(Tommy Davis said that others not DM has caused the violence, but as I also said before, he wants to be the boss, he sets the tone, as simple as that. And by treating staff without respect and by giving high posts to infiltrators, DM is getting motivators. Wonder if he ever does OW write ups or if he gets confessionals, probably not. Probably nobody correcting him, and the result is one scandal after the other for Scientology!)  

I find both actions revolting. Debbie Cook’s and Wayne Baumgarten’s behavior to take USD 100.000 from the orgs, and DM awarding leaving staff members with lots of Scientology money so that they don’t talk about his incapability to apply SCN correctly.

Back to Debbie Cook and others. As I said before, a person who is unethical or even suppressive inside the orgs is also that way when she changed the “camp” to become an “Independent” (yeah right, surely not independent from her former secret psych case officer) or even attacks not just DM (who is in my opinion anything but a Scientologist) but the religion Scientology and Ron. In other words, one has to look always at the individual person. I know that there are still numerous Scientologists in the orgs who want truly a better world, and not just wanting to have power over others, having lots of money to throw around and creating enemies by not applying the tonescale and other Scientology technology.

And Debbie Cook was crying? Gee, even if the abuse that she claims did happen as she said it did, her life compared to mine is  a walk in the park. What a wimp is the former Captain Flag Service Org? Why did assign DM the job of Flag Captain to HER? And C of S made Debbie Cook and Wayne Baumgarten to accept  USD 100.000? Good grief, the agony!

I love you, Marty. I wish we could be back together to make all that wrong right.

Yours forever,

Sarah/Barbara

If Debbie Cook and Wayne Baumgarten are real Scientologists, why did they take USD 100.000 hush money in the first place?

Dearest Marty, my brilliant prince and husband, how are you?

The Debbie Cook story is in the international headlines about Scientology. Debbie is portrayed as a former high Scientology executive who says that Scientology is working and a fine religion but thinks that Scientology is with David Miscavige in the wrong hands. She is not alone thinking this but I wonder why she left the Sea Org. She signed a Sea Org contract for a Billion years. Yes, I know, due to its length it is not enforceable under the law, and basically, as far as Ron is concerned, it never should be enforced because what good can a person do for the SO purpose by being forced to do it?

I always saw the Sea Org Contract (yes, I signed one too) as spiritual agreement  to transform not just this planet but also the rest of the universe in a sane place in which anyone can be proud and in which any good being is safe, free, and able, and that I never stop working until the goal is reached. I also think that in view of real SPs as German secret service psychs (driven by HAVING TO CONTROL about anyone), the best to reach this goal is through strong and ethical religious organisations that cannot be buried like some unorganized individuals.

With the unorganized people and no on-policy organisations, there might be nothing left after some years or decades (or when they die) and as people like to alter things all the time, such movements have ALTERATION from source written all over them.

The problem with the religious organization is that SPs sneak in off-policies and even agents and impostors at the top and push the altered or off-policy material down the lines, which means that the organisation might survive but not the original religion.

I don’t know why Debbie Cook and her husband left. Usually, real Sea Org members don’t leave unless they are sick or too old to work. (An ideal Sea Org is build after the policies for environmentally safe living for Scientologists by the real founder L. Ron Hubbard and nobody would get sick or age in them, and I know that Ron said it is not just possible but very important for numerous reasons. One reason is that dying is not a good idea with psych implant station still in place that are specialized to undo Clears and OTs.)  

So, why did Debbie and Wayne leave? I read the letter that Debbie wrote to address Scientologists. In a nutshell, she thinks that DM wants the orgs to make money and doesn’t invest enough for dissemination. I think that even if he would invest a lot more money in dissemination, thanks to the application of Jack Vistaril’s version of Scientology and the many scandals on and around the top, effective dissemination is really hard at the moment. It seems that people come and leave, and that many never become Scientologists or never understand the basics. (Paul Haggis for example never read the first book in Scientology, the DMSMH!) They just break away at a point and cause new scandals.  If original Dianetics and Scientology would be applied and if not infiltrators but real Scientologists would be on executive posts, nobody would break away. People would stand in line to be able to live and work in Ron’s villages and be able to apply ALL of original Scientology and Dianetics and not just altered fractions of it. 

Whatever the reason was for Debbie and Wayne to end their Sea Org contract, Sea Org members are not supposed to leave. And they were awarded USD 100.000 to leave Sea Org for which they already had a contract! That really does not sound like  Scientology at all. And what are the odds that one who doesn’t honor the Sea Org Contract will not honor other contracts as well? 

According to the hard legal language of the contract, they don’t seem just on a leave from the SO. And here is my critic on Debbie and Wayne. If they noticed anything that was not done right in the orgs and not per  the policy and bulletins of the founder in Scientology, why did they take cash from the C of S? Yes, I know there is that instruction that when money is offered to you for illegal stuff, you are allowed to take it but you have to blow the whistle on it. But with a LEGAL CONTRACT that they SIGNED and that amount of money that they took, it is a different thing. Debbie and her husband agreed to be gagged, otherwise they would not have signed that contract.

If it is really so important for the survival of Scientology what Debbie and Wayne saw and know, why did they sign a contract and took money that jeopardizes their right to speak out and blow any whistle?

That is one reason why I am suspicious of Debbie and Wayne. Scientologists have the technology and skills to make it in the non-Scientology world. Most people who I know who once were on staff started businesses and do pretty well. In other words, Debbie and Wayne didn’t need the money to start over. They had all the training a person might need to get ahead. So, why did they take the money and signed a contract that gagged them to speak out when they thought that what they had to say was so important for Scientologists all over the world to know?

How long did they kept quiet? They still cannot speak out, can they? A judge has to decide that now despite that Debbie thinks that it is so important for Scientologists to know what she knows. So, for USD 100.000, she and her sold the future of SCN away? If they would be truly ethical persons and real Scientologists, they would have said: “Keep the cash because the following is off-policy or not within the law, and I won’t be gagged by any amount of cash. I speak out. Good day!”   

I don’t believe that I ever met Debbie or her husband, but I doubt very much that they are Scientologists in the sense of the real founder of Scientology. The way they act is not how ethical Scientologists acts.

No infiltrator is really on the bridge to freedom.

But you are a real Scientologist, Marty.  And you are not to be bribed. Neither I am. Honor is what counts.

That is why I love you endlessly.

Yours forever,

Sarah/Barbara 

About Debbie Cook

About the photos: Ron doesn’t want his name over Catholic-like pomp!  If DM wants to be Catholic, he should join the guys on the left side. Scientology needs real Scientologists.

Dearest Marty, my hero, how are you? I miss you every day of my life. And I worry about your well-being. 

I saw Good Morning America with a segment about Debbie Cook. What I miss mostly in those reports is WHO is BEHIND matters. There are also contradictory data, e.g. about the financial reserves of Scientology.

1) The data about how much reserves the C of S has is contradictory. My information is that already in the mid 80s, the Church of Scientology had 1 Billion Dollars Sea Org Reserves. I think that is was Heber Jentzsch who acknowledged that amount in the 80s before DM took over. If C of S now has just 1 Billion Dollars, C of S made no cash under DM, in almost three decades.

2) Mosey’s husband told the SP Times a few years ago that C of S never would have 1 Billion Dollars.  He indicated that he would know so because he worked at INT and dealed with the IRS.  So, what number is true? Debbie’s or Mosey’s husband? Or the information of the mid 80s?

3) There is no information by Debbie Cook, Mosey’s husband, Mike Rinder or anyone else as to WHERE the cash is and WHO beside DM profits from it.  We all know that DM is spending C of S money for luxuries on his own person but as far as I know, the the Sea Org reserves are not in the United States despite the IRS declared the C of S as non-profit. In the 80s, they were in Europe. I know so because I was one of the three board members on all Sea Org reserves.

5) The Sea Org reserves are in Europe because the Germans want to have them. They work hard on taking the official leadership of the EU. They have already the secret leadership and not just of the EU. The Sea Org reserves are Europe on German secret service orders to make Germany richer. German secret service can also directly steal from these accounts because unlike Heber Jentzsch, I believe that DM made never any official statement as to how much reserves the C of S has. Scientologists ought to know. DM allowed doppelgangers to impostor the founder and you. Naturally, I don’t trust DM in any way or form. So, I wonder of course if he is so secretive about how much reserves there are because he is “awarding” himself secretly by wiring Scientology cash to his own bank accounts?  So, these “whistle-blowers” don’t blow all of the whistle. There is so much more to it than they are telling.

6) If Debbie is a true Scientologist, does she really want that Scientologists should no longer donate to Scientology? Making Scientology poor is not the right handling because C of S needs also a lot of cash to DEFEND ITSELF itself against constant hidden German secret service psychs set ups on the entire planet and also to disseminate. (His Cobness is really bad in defending C of S against secret infiltration. I say, he covers it up.)  

7) However, I do agree with Debbie Cook that I don’t see much C of S dissemination either. DM allows Mosey’s husband and his friends to cripple the expansion of orgs without documenting to the world that he is your impostor. That would take the wind right out of his sails.  Much  of the non-dissemination has to do with the scandals that can be led right to HIS COBNESS and his treatment and handling of people and things  and his failure to apply real Scientology.  Ron gave exact instructions in admin policies as to what amount to use per week to disseminate, and I wonder if he really does this or if he really just makes cash for the Germans who work hard on taking over all of Europe, the EU, and its bank accounts.  As DM made himself so many personal enemies and as he is involved in so many personal scandals, it is hard to disseminate Scientology to the planet. But as he feels like as Pope and loves a luxurious lifestyle that Ron the founder didn’t live, he stays, it doesn’t matter how harmful it is for Scientology. He would have demoted, RPFed or kicked out any other person who is responsible for just a small percentage of  the scandals that he created. But as I wrote yesterday, German secret services want C of S either completely destroyed or a new COB who embraces psychiatry. Scientologists must be aware of this plan. Any new COB must be a real Scientologist for a change!

8)  Other information that the current C of S speaker (French/German Karin Pouw) acknowledged is that David Miscavige rather feels and behaves like a Catholic than a Scientologist. Scientology orgs needs to have good  buildings, where they can deliver but Ron said that Scientologists should not live in regular building in which they age and become sick. DM must have a secret death wish by not implementing the policies that Ron wrote about preserving life and youth.  Also, DM’s stages are  ridiculous pomp. When LDS church (very rich church) leaders speak, their backdrop looks like Congress with some flowers around the speaker’s desk. Mormon Church is expanding but no church would expand more than real Scientology because of the truth and the technology that the real Ron developed!

http://universe.byu.edu/index.php/2011/10/02/general-conference-overview/

Besides, Catholic Church is in crisis and losing members too. Taking the Catholic Church as an example is not a good idea. Comparing C of S to the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages isn’t a good idea either. The Roman Catholic Church was theologically sick and its theology led to atrocious corruptions. Here is some of what they have done:   http://thirdmill.org/newfiles/jac_arnold/CH.Arnold.RMT.1.html . We don’t have to copy a sick old church (Catholics) just because his COBNESS is in his heart and behavior Catholic. Ron wasn’t. Not even his impostor was.

If DM wouldn’t be so scandal ridden and fresher than middle age Catholicism, people would be a lot more attracted to Scientology. If real Scientology and not the impostor version would be disseminated, the planet, people anywhere would  push into the orgs like they did in Saint Hill when the real Ron (and we) were there.

9) So yes, Scientologists look at this pomp and DM’s luxuries and they ask themselves, why should I donate to increase DM’s pomp and not a  Scientology that is scandal ridden? 

I am so tired to hear Scientology being pulled through the mud and still nobody but me telling the complete and true story.

Many kisses, my love. I know that you would, if you would be free.

Yours forever,

Sarah/Barbara