ILoveMyOriginalMartyBlog

Blog for the original Marty

Posts Tagged ‘Texas Attorney General’s Office

Monique’s husband (allegedly no part of organized crime) had extensive liaison with experts in the subject, from local law enforcement, to the Texas Attorney General’s Office, to the United States Department of Justice??? If he doesn’t impostor you as part of organized crime, Marty, is he impostering you completely on his own volition?

with 10 comments

7

Dearest Marty, my one and only, how are you?

I’m waiting for the plumber to come by. There is water leaking outside near the house and I better have fixed that soon. Last time, he overcharged me and asked three times the price. (After I complained to his partner, he gave me 100 bucks back.) This time I better watch what he is doing and that he is doing it right, and I won’t let him get away with overcharging me again.

To the other subject: Monique’s husband. This man is unbelievable. He is your impostor. If it is really true (however, he admitted before on TV that he is a liar) that he had extensive liaison with local law enforcement,  to the Texas Attorney General’s Office, to the United States Department of Justice, these authorities then are working with your impostor together, Marty. You would have serious legal claims against them if Monique’s husband wasn’t lying.

If he is not part of organized crime (yeah right!) despite his actions to impostor you fit perfectly into German secret service plans to make you disappear and undo your legacy, then he is alone responsible for impostering you. According to that, not even David Miscavige or Mike Rinder put him up to be your impostor. (And he impostors you also before the court and in affidavits.)  Then he did it all on his own. This guy has some nerves, I am telling you.

I have seen the YouTube video, where Monique’s husband, directs Monique to interrupt the conversation of the Busters. She follows him like a puppet. I never have seen anything like that before. She would have never filed that Million Dollar case if he wouldn’t put her up for it. He doesn’t support her. It is *His* case. He wants the millions so badly.

By settling with Debbie Cook, Wayne Baumgarten, and detectives  Marrick and Arnold, DM sent a message that C of S is the cash cow for anyone. That invited more cases, and particularly that of Monique. If he settles with her, multiple other get-rich-lawsuits by others suing the orgs will follow.

Monique’s husband is a coward. He has no guts to sue the C of S as he is afraid that they will no longer cover for him.  Tommy Davis indicated something to the SP-Times that they know something real shocking about Monique’s husband. I wonder how long C of S will still cover for Mosey’s husband before they reveal this. 

How can the surveillance of Monique be so bad that it warrants millions of Dollars damages if he doesn’t sue too?  After all, he lived with her all the time at the same place. If he hasn’t grounds to sue, how come she has them? As he isn’t a co-plaintiff of her legal action (he thinks he’s getting the millions from obedient wifey once she got them), it makes her claims really really small.   

As for sexual harassment, if she gets millions for it, I should too. Some people say that I err and that Dave Touretzky never mailed me that sexually harassing mail that I got some years ago. Do you know why I differ with them? Because back then, he had pornographic images right on this CMU website. It was set up as if that mail was sent by the orgs but I am sure they didn’t mail it to me. ReligiousFreedomWatch contacted me later wanting a copy of that mail. Many in the orgs consider me difficult (including DM, I bet), so I am sure that they never would have contacted me if OSA originated that harassing mail.  It can be determined by a DNA-test who mailed it. If Touretzky’s DNA isn’t in it, he is not the sexual harasser. But I think Dave Touretzky doesn’t think that porn is low and harassing to a woman. For him it is probably just “a guy thing”.  

Anyway, it was reported that Monique said before the court that she doesn’t know who mailed her the sex toy to her or a romantic note to a co-worker. If she can’t prove it, if DNA doesn’t prove that DM or OSA or the busters mailed that, she can’t expect millions by the C of S.

I doubt that Dip Waldrip is a decent judge, Marty.  He said something odd, in my opinion. He said something like that he would fear “appeals” in regards to that the various Scientology identities had their own lawyers. Should a judge be afraid of appeals or should he just rule what the law says and what’s the right thing  for justice? If he fears appeals, he is already indicating that what he plans to rule has grounds for appeals.  I find this odd, even biased towards Scientology.

Maybe he is also star-struck ordering Leah Remini to testify.  As she didn’t even knew where Michelle Miscavige is, what makes the court think that she knows DM’s other activities?

The orgs should have published right from the start that Monique’s husband is your impostor, Marty. DM knows for sure. Mike Rinder too. Now they are getting their motivators. They are such non-Scientologists in actions. If they would be real Scientologists they would have know that the impostor actions will come back to bite them. Truth comes out always, said Ron, and yes, it does.   

Love you so very much,

Yours forever.

Sarah/Barbara

80